Skip to main content
TonyG
MARC ANDREESSEN REBUTTAL 2020

MARC ANDREESSEN REBUTTAL 2020

Back to the blog
The Systems MapCulture & Communication2 min read

Validity: 65 — Historical Context

By Tony "WhyNot" Greenberg

This article is a rebuttal to Marc Andreessen's call to action to "build big," arguing that his position is hypocritical given his firm's investment in…

Share this essay

Before You Read

Before you read 'MARC ANDREESSEN REBUTTAL 2020': What do the best negotiators and the best jazz musicians have in common?

Reveal

They both know that the most powerful move is listening — and the second most powerful is knowing when not to play.

Hint

It's about what you don't do.

Marc Andreessen has made a call to action around building big in response to our current crisis. First, some areas of agreement: it’s not like we haven’t written a “where’s my flying car” article ourselves back 10 years ago. And I agree that regulatory capture and fear of change are both big negatives. But while I’d get this sort of big idea criticism from someone like Elon Musk. But Marc Andreessen’s VC investments are often the usual Silicon Valley fluff shuffling bits around. Andreessen Horowitz invested in Crypto Kitties, for heaven’s sake. So if he controls a few billion in investor funds and doesn’t invest a penny in anything he’s advocating here, there’s a pretty good chance he doesn’t actually think it’s feasible or profitable. And he’s way too smart to think the principal problems are something amorphous like will, desire, and fear of change. The real problems are incentives, integrity, and the lack of a shared community whose future will matter more to people than grabbing their bit.

Here’s an analogy: If a random guy on the street says “federal deficits are an existential problem” then it’s a reasonable opinion, and maybe he really believes it. But if it’s a congressman saying that and always voting for spending increases and tax cuts, he’s full of poo. Same here — Marc Andreessen has a good degree of control over at least $4B in investment money, and can probably draw in more with his firm’s brand. If he really thought that “all of these fields are highly lucrative already and should be prime stomping grounds for capitalist investment” then a chunk of that would go to moonshots instead of Crypto kitties. If Marc Andreessen doesn’t put his money where his mouth is, that means he doesn’t really believe it.

The Lesson

The gap between what venture capital says it values and what it actually funds is the defining hypocrisy of Silicon Valley. Calling for moonshots while funding social apps is not vision — it's marketing.

Next Steps

  • Look at the portfolio of any VC firm that talks about 'building the future' — count how many investments have a 20+ year horizon
  • If you're raising capital, ask your investors: what's the longest hold period in your fund? The answer tells you everything.
  • Read 'The Innovation Stack' by Jim McKelvey for what 'building big' actually looks like from the inside

Since this was written

VC-backed companies discovering they're just expensive wrappers around OpenAI

LinkedIn · 2026

This supports the post's argument that venture capital often funds superficial 'trivial ventures' rather than the substantive, 'moonshot' projects they claim to champion.

  • #Marc Andreessen
  • #venture capital
  • #Silicon Valley
  • #innovation
  • #moonshot thinking
  • #deep tech
  • #investment hypocrisy
  • #a16z
More in Culture & Communication
Did this land?

Discourse

What's the verdict?

Be the first to react

Rate this thinking

Did this change how you see culture & communication?

If this resonated, try a diagnostic tool

Turn thinking into action. Assessments that clarify who you are and what you want. Five to ten minutes. Immediate insight.

Start Assessment

Consciousness-Aligned Capital

ImpactSoul tokenizes high-value assets to fund regenerative impact. Art, culture, and consciousness — backed by real value.

Explore ImpactSoul

The Mirror

This article is a mirror for your willingness to challenge powerful narratives

Can you disagree with someone you admire without losing respect for them — or yourself?

Truth & IntegrityTake the full assessment
Try This

The Antidote Challenge

This week, pay close attention to your conversations with a loved one. Identify one instance of criticism, contempt, defensiveness, or stonewalling in your own communication. Instead of reacting, consciously apply the Gottman-approved antidote: use a gentle start-up, express appreciation, take responsibility, or self-soothe. Notice how this small shift changes the dynamic of the conversation.

Where This Leads
A Riddle To Carry With You

I arrive on four horses, though I have no steed. I poison the well of love with a toxic deed. To banish my shadow, you must learn to mend, What am I?

Go Deeper
  • 'The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work' by John M. Gottman and Nan Silver
  • 'Attached: The New Science of Adult Attachment and How It Can Help You Find—and Keep—Love' by Amir Levine and Rachel S.F. Heller
  • 'Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life' by Marshall B. Rosenberg
Discover Your Pattern

Take the TrueSelf Soul Print Assessment

A personalized map of your consciousness, values, and growth edges — built from the same frameworks that inform these essays.

Explore Assessments

Originally published at tonygreenberg.com

Why this matters now

We are living through the largest transfer of wealth, power, and attention in human history. Every essay on this site is a dispatch from the front lines of that fight — naming what's extractive, building what replaces it. If this one landed, it's because the question it raises hasn't been answered yet — and probably won't be by the people currently in charge of answering it.

Tony Greenberg
Tony "WhyNot" Greenberg

Systems thinker. Impact builder. Corporate accountability crusader.

Tony Greenberg is the CEO of RampRate and founder of ImpactSoul. About Tony

“If this made you think differently — share it. If it made you angry — good.”

Book a strategy hour: Enter The GateEngagements begin with a scoping conversation

Send preparation doc: tony@impactsoul.is

Prep doc required 48hrs before session · All sessions recorded via Fireflies · 30-day review gate before Stage 2

2× MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE — Do the work. Document it. Zero results? We refund your fee, times two.

Follow @ThinkTony on X · LinkedIn · Only Time Buys Trust

Request an AI summary of this essay

Continue Reading

The thread continues.

Micro-Commitment

What's one thing you'll do differently after reading this?